President-elect Asset promised to impose new trade taxesincluding one Tariff of 10 to 20 percent on all imports, at least one 60 percent priceTariffs are taxes imposed by a country on goods imported from another country. The prices are trade barriers which increase prices, reduce the available quantities of goods and services for American businesses and consumersand create an economic burden for foreign exporters.
on Chinese imports and a tariff of 25 to 100 percent on Mexican imports. At least a dozen estimates on Trump’s proposed tariffs show they will have a detrimental effect on the U.S. economy, confirming economists’ common view that tariffs reduce trade and distort production, leading to a decline in the standard of living.
A price is a taxA tax is a mandatory payment or tax collected by local, state, and national governments from individuals or businesses to cover the costs of general government services, goods, and activities.
on imported goods, applied at the border when a business or person in the United States purchases a product from abroad. Tariffs raise the price of goods produced abroad, incentivizing consumers to switch to domestically produced goods and providing domestic producers with the opportunity to raise their prices. The advantages enjoyed by domestic producers, i.e. higher prices and sales, come at the expense of consumers (including professional consumers). For this reason, the tariffs are redistributive, taking income from some and returning it to protected businesses.
Even though protected companies can grow thanks to tariffs, they are not low-cost producers. Thus, tariffs lead to less efficient production, which leads to reduced economic output and income in the long run. This is the standard analysis of tariffs dating back to Adam Smith and the classic economistswho recommended keeping tariffs as low as possible (tariffs were the government’s main source of revenue at the time).
The debate has its nuances, such as the potential impact of customs duties on price levels. Customs duties could have an inflationary impact or cause an economic slowdown in the short term, in function on the question of whether the Federal Reserve is taking steps to relax policy and accommodate rising taxes (we will discuss these issues in a future analysis). But regardless of whether the short-term adjustment involves inflationInflation This is when the general price of goods and services increases throughout the economy, reducing the purchasing power of a currency and the value of certain assets. The same salary covers fewer goods, services and bills. It is sometimes called “hidden tax”, as it leaves taxpayers worse off due to higher costs and “bracket creep,” while increasing the purchasing power of the government.
or a temporary increase in unemployment, the long-term adjustment of tariffs implies a fall in income and production.
In the long run, tariffs reduce the size of the economy by reducing work and investment. This is because tariffs raise the relative prices of imported and protected goods, and after paying these higher prices, people have less income to spend elsewhere. In reality, this means that tariffs reduce the after-tax value of income by reducing the level of consumption that people can afford. Reducing the value of after-tax income reduces incentives to work, which reduces hours worked and, therefore, capital investment. Fewer hours worked and a lower capital stock result in a sustainably lower level of output and income.
In addition, the prices lead to dynamic inefficiencies, which reduce productivity. By creating a protected domestic market, tariffs alleviate competitive pressures that otherwise force businesses to remain innovative. Instead of having to constantly look for ways to improve their processes and meet consumer demands, businesses can simply enjoy higher profits through protection. Past (and current) episodes of protection, both anecdotal and empiricallyreveal that protected firms tend to use their higher profits to lobby for broader and longer protection, rather than to increase research and development or capital spending.
Tariffs can also lead to inefficiencies due to political favoritism and uncertainty. A new analysis Tariffs from Trump’s first term found that companies that made political donations to Republican candidates were more likely to receive tariff exemptions than companies that donated to Democrats. Increased uncertainty regarding trade and tariff policy itself may hamper investment and reduce income.
This brings us to Trump’s proposals. A dozen macroeconomic estimates have taken different approaches to analyzing Trump’s proposed tariffs, from estimating the decline in aggregate demand resulting from tax hikes to using various business models to our work in the Tax Foundation assessing the effects of increasing taxes on labor. All studies systematically conclude that the tariffs proposed by Trump would have a negative impact on UNITED STATES economy.
The modeling highlights another major downside to imposing tariffs: the geopolitical pressure on foreign governments to respond with retaliatory tariffs. When foreign governments impose taxes on U.S. exports, it reduces the amount of U.S. producers selling abroad, lowering revenues and further reducing production. Most private forecasts of the effects of U.S. tariffs model their impact with retaliation, ranging from tit-for-tat to more targeted responses. Estimates of Warwick McKibbin et al. from the Peterson Institution for International Economics suggest that retaliation could more than double economic losses from U.S. tariffs.
Many of these same studies also included estimates of the economic effects of Trump’s first trade war, which range from a reduction in real output of 0.2% to 0.7%. THE economic literature reports a similar range of effects on U.S. production since the first trade war, from -0.17 percent to -0.50 percent.
An aberrant estimate, excluded from the table below, produces results which suggest that universal tariffs would increase economic production and income. A scathing criticism by international trade economists One of the assumptions underlying this estimate explains how researchers manipulated a business model, against all economic evidence, to produce positive results through higher trade taxes. Reviewers called the effort “intentionally misleading” with “key assumptions.” . . (which find) absolutely no support in the economic literature.
President-elect Trump may want to impose tariffs to encourage investment and work, but his strategy will backfire. Tariffs will certainly create benefits for protected industries, but those benefits will come at the expense of consumers and other industries throughout the economy.
Stay informed about the tax policies that affect you.
Subscribe to receive insights from our trusted experts straight to your inbox.
Share this article