Trump’s Push for Unchecked Appointments Raises Concerns
The New York Times is reporting that President-elect Donald Trump is pushing to install government officials without Senate approval, a move critics say sidesteps important checks and balances. Trump plans to use “recess appointments,” which allow a president to temporarily fill positions when Congress isn’t in session. This rule is typically reserved for emergencies, not for bypassing Senate confirmation.
Why Trump Wants This
Trump’s Cabinet picks include controversial figures who might struggle to pass Senate scrutiny. Among the rumored choices are:
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for Health and Human Services, known for his anti-vaccine stance.
- Kristi Noem, South Dakota governor, for Homeland Security, who gained attention for past controversies.
- Matt Gaetz, facing ethics concerns, as attorney general.
- Pete Hegseth, a Fox News host, for the Department of Defense.
These picks have drawn criticism, with opponents labeling them unqualified or problematic. Trump’s desire to bypass Senate approval may be an attempt to avoid public scrutiny of his choices.
What the Critics Say
Critics argue that using recess appointments for non-emergency situations undermines the democratic process. Even conservative figures, like the late Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, have criticized the practice. In 2014, Scalia called recess appointments a relic of history, saying their main use today is to let presidents dodge Senate oversight.
Alexander Hamilton, one of America’s Founding Fathers, emphasized the importance of Senate confirmation to ensure that presidential nominees are qualified and not just loyal allies. Critics warn that allowing Trump to sidestep these checks could lead to unqualified individuals in critical roles.
Supporters’ Argument
Some Trump allies argue that he should be free to appoint whoever he wants. They believe that his election win gives him the mandate to lead without interference.
What’s at Stake
If Trump is allowed to make recess appointments for major positions:
- The Senate’s role in confirming nominees could be weakened.
- Key government agencies might be led by individuals with little experience.
- The Republican Party could face backlash if these appointments fail or cause scandals.
A Call for Accountability
Critics say if Republicans support this approach, they must own the results. If unqualified appointees perform poorly or cause harm, responsibility will fall on those who allowed Trump to bypass the usual processes.
While some hope for success with Trump’s appointees, others warn that ignoring norms and standards could have lasting consequences for the country.